![why do gay men get hiv easier than others why do gay men get hiv easier than others](https://assets.medpagetoday.net/media/images/93xxx/93143.jpg)
![why do gay men get hiv easier than others why do gay men get hiv easier than others](https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/v8ExxmvyAJv46sxHT-Pyl3ZRN68=/0x68:2200x1306/1600x900/media/img/mt/2014/07/RTR1RIZE/original.jpg)
If the phase with 2,000 people indicates it's effective, you try 10,000 high-risk people. If you actually get significantly less, it looks like the vaccine is probably effective. If it's ineffective, you'd expect five cases of HIV in those 2,000 people. Suppose you gave the vaccine to 2,000 people. You already know that without the vaccine, 0.25% of gay men get HIV each year (or whatever the number is). You test those people for HIV, and watch for safety more. Gay men who are sexually active, in this case. Then if it's safe, you test for effectiveness (and more safety) by giving it to high-risk people. Then you test it for safety by giving it to some people and monitoring them closely. When you put someone some blood, does it do what you expect? Here's the real answer.įirst, you test if it "works" in a test tube. Others have given sarcastic or half answers. It's not simple, and there is harm in pretending like it is. It is a more reasonable response to like the good things the company does while also disliking the bad things, and possibly to even get involved and support some of the company's efforts even while opposing others. So, trying to roll up the whole mess and say "it's good" or "it's bad" is to grossly oversummarize and commit to an oversimplified position. So, such businesses do good things, as well as evil things, as well as things that simultaneously cause harm while offering benefit, all while being "plugged in" to an incredibly interconnected economy that keeps people employed while providing valuable services and also while contributing to wealth inequality and pollution and so on. In reality, something like a large business is an incredibly complex beast that includes a group of leaders that disagree with each other on important issues, an army of employees who also disagree with each other and go on internal campaigns against each other when establishing company agendas, all of whom are beholden to a huge mass of stakeholders that also disagree with each other on every relevant issue. People seem to need things to be very simple and easily categorized. It makes me feel less alone in the world. It's nice to read the occasional reasonable post on Slashdot. Learn a little before you contribute to sex worker stigma, please. In every single case, the performer who tested positive picked it up from another outside-the-industry contact. There has not been a confirmed on-set transmission of HIV in any compliant porn shop since 2004. When contact tracing is done, everyone in the system has their record expired and they have to test again before production can get underway.Īnd the system WORKS. When a performer tests positive, PASS calls an industry-wide halt to production that all reputable houses honor, during which contacts are traced and everyone involved is retested.
![why do gay men get hiv easier than others why do gay men get hiv easier than others](https://aidsvu.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/01-overall.png)
Records are expired after two weeks, meaning the performer has to retest to continue working. Trying to fake a printed record draws an immediate lifetime ban from the system. Records are not printed, and only verified electronically. The database is independently accessible by the employer.
WHY DO GAY MEN GET HIV EASIER THAN OTHERS FREE
Performer Availability Screening Services (PASS), spearheaded by the Free Speech Coalition, is a system that reputable porn houses use to verify performer testing.Ī performer tests at a participating medical provider and is listed in the database as available or not available for work.